Sample diagnostic report

The Starfall Ledger

full-diagnostic · COMPLETED

Issues
5
High
1
Medium
2
Low
2

Overall diagnostic summary

Structured diagnostic report generated. Original manuscript text was not changed.

Report disclaimer
Findings are diagnostic review items, not editorial decisions or assessments of literary quality. Severity and confidence indicate review priority and certainty.

Severity and confidence scales

Severity indicates possible impact if the finding is valid. Confidence indicates how certain the diagnostic scan is that the issue is present.

Severity = impact

Low: minor review item. Medium: notable continuity, pacing, or structure concern. High: potentially significant contradiction or logic issue.

Confidence = certainty

Low: weak evidence. Medium: visible pattern with possible context. High: strong textual or measurable evidence.

Issues by category

Timeline

Severity: HighConfidence: High (86%)Chapter 37: Glass Moon

Compressed action may exceed stated time window

Several physically demanding actions are placed inside a four-minute eclipse window, creating a plausibility risk unless magic, distance, or time dilation is clarified.

What does this mean?
Evidence / text area
Chapter/section: Chapter 37: Glass Moon
Location: Estimated pages 412-418; Sequence-level signal
The eclipse would last four minutes, no longer.
Sorren reached the vault steps, climbed until his lungs burned, fought the priest, copied the third page, and returned before the light changed.
Diagnostic next step

Map the beat-by-beat action against the stated time limit and clarify any worldbuilding exception.

How to review this
  1. Put the cited moments into the order readers are supposed to understand them.
  2. Compare that intended order with the time markers currently on the page.
  3. Add or adjust a date, elapsed-time cue, transition, or return-from-memory marker only where the reader could lose the sequence.

Mark intentional if the time shift is meant to be ambiguous and later clarified, ignore if the evidence is unrelated, or mark for correction if readers need a stronger time anchor.

Character Consistency

Severity: MediumConfidence: Medium (69%)Chapter 42: The Fifth Moon

Possible injury continuity issue

A character's broken hand appears to heal or function normally before the manuscript references treatment or elapsed recovery time.

What does this mean?
Evidence / text area
Chapter/section: Chapter 42: The Fifth Moon
Location: Estimated page 477; Paragraph 9; Sentence 2
Liora cradled her broken right hand against her coat and refused the splint.
Liora wrote three pages of coordinates in a clean, steady hand before sunrise.
Diagnostic next step

Review whether enough time, medical care, or magical healing has been established.

How to review this
  1. Open each cited passage and list the character state in story order.
  2. Check whether enough time, cause, healing, or emotional transition is visible between those passages.
  3. Add only the smallest needed cue: a time marker, recovery beat, consequence, or clearer wording.

Mark intentional if the trail is already clear on the page, ignore if the signal is not relevant, or mark for correction if the manuscript needs a bridge, status update, or wording adjustment.

Plot Hole Detection

Severity: MediumConfidence: Medium (73%)Chapter 11: The Salt Archive

Prophecy rule may be contradicted later

The manuscript states that city-fall predictions cannot name living people, but a later ledger entry names the current empress without a detected explanation.

What does this mean?
Evidence / text area
Chapter/section: Chapter 11: The Salt Archive
Location: Estimated page 119; Paragraph 4; Sentence 1
No living name could survive the ledger's ink.
The final entry read: Empress Vale will open the eastern gate.
Diagnostic next step

Confirm whether the contradiction is a reveal, an exception, or a rule that needs adjustment.

How to review this
  1. Identify the exact story question, object, rule, choice, or reveal being flagged.
  2. Search earlier and later chapters for setup, payoff, motive, cost, or consequence.
  3. Add a breadcrumb, clarify motive, or strengthen consequence only if the story currently asks readers to accept too much.

Mark intentional if the surprise is earned elsewhere, ignore if the item is background texture, or mark for correction if setup, motive, cost, or consequence is missing.

Pacing Diagnostics

Severity: LowConfidence: Medium (64%)Chapter 29: Inventory of Saints

Long average paragraph length

The chapter has a high words-per-paragraph measurement during a lore-heavy archive sequence.

What does this mean?
Evidence / text area
Chapter/section: Chapter 29: Inventory of Saints
Location: Estimated pages 321-337; Section-level signal
214 words per paragraph average detected
The section lists temple ranks, relic histories, moon calendars, and ledger custody rules before returning to Sorren's objective.
Diagnostic next step

Review whether exposition can be broken with scene action, dialogue pressure, or clearer subsection turns.

How to review this
  1. Read the cited section beside the chapters before and after it.
  2. Identify whether the pace should feel fast, slow, reflective, tense, or transitional.
  3. Adjust scene length, paragraph density, summary, or transitions only where the actual rhythm fights the intended rhythm.

Mark intentional if the rhythm serves the scene, ignore if the signal does not affect reading flow, or mark for correction if the section needs a pacing pass.

Extracted Outline

Severity: LowConfidence: High (84%)Manuscript structure

Extracted structural pattern

The middle third contains several consecutive travel, archive, and council chapters before the next major irreversible choice.

What does this mean?
Evidence / text area
Chapter/section: Manuscript structure
Location: Detected sections: 54
Chapters 21-28: travel, arrival, hearing, archive, council, archive, travel, council.
Next major irreversible choice detected in Chapter 30.
Diagnostic next step

Review the mid-book sequence for escalation, variety, and decision points.

How to review this
  1. Write one sentence for what changes in the cited section.
  2. Compare that change with the surrounding section movement.
  3. Clarify purpose, order, transition, or escalation only where the section does not move the story the way you intend.

Mark intentional if the structure matches your design, ignore if the extraction is not useful, or mark for correction if a section needs clearer purpose or placement.

Story Audit Studio™